Searching for Sugar Man (2012)

Searching for Sugar Man (2012) movie poster

director Malik Bendjelloul
viewed: 02/04/2013

There are a number of remarkable documentaries about music, musicians, rock’n'roll, the business, ones that encapsulate so much of the experience of the dreams, aspirations, the fame, the realities of the world of making it as a musician.  DiG! (2004) is a brilliant portrait of excess and ego.  The Devil and Daniel Johnston (2005) is a remarkable image of genius(?) gone crazy. Anvil! The Story of Anvil (2008) is an amusing picture of an “almost was” band.  Each of those films offer some perspective on music and the people who’ve put their lives into their music and resonate, I believe, for anyone who has been in and around the music biz.  Searching for Sugar Man adds yet another dimension to the films of the genre.

It’s the story of Sixto Rodriguez, a musician from Detroit from the late 1960′s/early 1970′s, who cut two albums, and despite some passionate appreciation by a few, disappeared from the music scene.  Of course, in the United States, nobody really noticed and probably nobody really knew who he was.

But in South Africa, a country that for many years was under the brutal rule of Apartheid, somehow, Rodriguez’s music reached them and connected in a huge way.  In South Africa, he was as popular and important as Bob Dylan, who Rodriguez sounds a bit like.  But in the 1970′s-1980′s, cultural isolation kept this fact rather unknown.  It isn’t until the 1990′s that a fan and a journalist research their way to find out what happened to Rodriguez, about whom some quite interesting urban myths existed.

It’s a pre-internet tale of discovery.  Because they do find him, still in Detroit, a father of three adult women and a laborer working these many years in construction and living humbly.  And they bring him to South Africa where this  rather “normal” guy is heralded and welcomed as a huge rock star.

It’s a heartwarming story, certainly as its portrayed in the film, produced in Europe and directed by Malik Bendjelloul.  Bendjelloul tells the tale as a detective story, from the South Africans who were such passionate fans that they unraveled their mystery fostered in distance and isolation.

The image of South Africa is quite interesting, getting a sense of the vibe of the young white people who lived during Apartheid, how the music fostered their own sense of rebellion and change.  But mostly it’s Rodriguez himself.  With his big black sunglasses, he just screams the part of “rock star”.  This second generation Mexican-American in ice cold Detroit.  A talent with some ardent admirers, still quite the humble man, even when decades later he is given the sort of treatment that inspires so many to become musicians.  And now, with the film, he’s finally going to be better known in his native country.  It’s quite a tale and it’s quite well-told.

The Imposter (2012)

The Imposter (2012) movie poster

director Bart Layton
viewed: 02/03/2013

The Imposter is a very disappointing documentary about a very fascinating story. A few years ago, I read a New Yorker article about the case which I found immensely intriguing.  It’s one of those stories that stick with you, haunt your brain, and fascinate.

It’s the story of serial “impostor” Frédéric Bourdin, a French adult (in his young 20′s at the time) who pretended to been a lost teenager in place after place, all over Europe.  When his identity is investigated in Spain, he pretends to be a missing teen from Texas, Nicolas Barclay.  Barclay had disappeared three or four years before and his family was thrilled to have found him.  So thrilled that they brought him home, treated him as the lost son, despite the fact that Bourdin had different colored eyes from Nicolas and spoke with a pronounced French accent.

The article delved into the psychology of the family who denied the obvious, so desirous of finding a lost child.  But beyond that, there was suggested some complicity of one of Nicolas’ brothers to have perhaps been involved in the real Nicolas’ disappearance and potential murder.  It’s suggested that the family may have contrived denial even more so for having sensed this truth.

Eventually, the truth came out, Bourdin went on to more hijinks before eventually settling himself into an adult life.  What The Imposter does offer is Bourdin’s side of the story.  His interview narrates the bulk of the film.  He divulges his damaged childhood as a half-Algerian child abandoned by his parents, his lack of identity that made him strive to live other childhoods in other places.  His “chameleon-like” skills, his life flitting from identity to identity as an emotional search, not just the work of a sophisticated confidence man.

Nicolas’ family are shown as the honest rubes, motivated out of sorrow and love.  And they come across as earnest people.

The film, however, adds very little.  There are such strange psychologies at work in Bourdin himself, in the Barclay family, the depths are left unsounded.  The style of the film, using recreations and other stylistic flourishes seems more interested in its own flair than in the rich truths below the surface of this bizarre, fascinating story.

Ultimately, no one knows what happened to Nicolas.  The mystery pertains.  The brother who was thought to have potentially killed him died of a drug overdose.  The family denies the truth of that.  A family so eager to find its lost son that it believed such an unlikely story, such an unlikely impostor.  Read the article, skip the movie.

Hell Drivers (1957)

Hell Drivers (1957) movie poster

director Cy Endfield
viewed: 01/26/2013 at the Castro Theatre, SF, CA

The second feature I caught at the Castro Theatre’s Noir City Festival was Hell Drivers, an English production, like Night of the Demon (1957), also featuring the festival’s guest of honor Peggy Cummins.  Unlike Night of the DemonHell Drivers might fit a little better into the Noir category, though it also might be pushing the true definition a bit.

It’s a gritty drama that perhaps falls into a subgenre of movies about truck drivers and the tough world they inhabit, perhaps a bit like They Drive by Night (1940) which is actually considered a Noir film though it also depicts a kind of social realism.

Directed by Red Scare scapegoat ex-pat Cy Endfield, the film actually captures a Britain of genuine character.  It also features a very notable cast beyond stars Stanley Baker, Cummins, and Herbert Lom.  It includes Sean Connery, Patrick McGoohan, David McCallum, and Jill Ireland.

It’s the gritty story of an ex-con (Baker) who lands a rough job as a ballast driver.  The crew is a pack of tough guys, with Red (McGoohan) as the toughest of the lot, all driving hell for leather across the English roads, back and forth with trucks full or empty of gravel.  The boss encourages recklessness and speed and is also ruthlessly pitting them against each other while he skims from the top.

It’s an entertaining yarn.  And it’s interesting to watch to Cummins pictures back to back.  Neither of these films has anything on Gun Crazy (1950), her best role, but it does illuminate the pretty, vibrant actress.

Good stuff.

Night of the Demon (1957)

Night of the Demon (1957) movie poster

director Jacques Tourneur
viewed: 01/26/2013 at the Castro Theatre, SF, CA

It’s a little hard for me to believe, but I think this showing of Night of the Demon was my first to San Francisco’s Noir City Festival, even though this is its 11th year.  Odder perhaps that the first film I see at this notable film noir festival is not exactly a noir film.  But rather, it’s the first of a double feature starring Peggy Cummins, who was this year’s guest of honor, most notable for her amazing performance in the remarkable Gun Crazy (1950), which opened the festival the night before..

It was fine enough for me, a fan of director Jacques Tourneur and the film itself, glad to see it on the big screen, glad to have impetus to finally go to the festival.

Luckily, this time around, they showed the original British Night of the Demon as opposed to the truncated American version Curse of the Demon.  It’s a little longer and features a particularly uncanny scene with a clan of probably devil worshipers in the English countryside.

For a film that Martin Scorsese has listed as one of the scariest movies of all time (a pretty damn fine list), it’s certainly one of the more bizarre horror films of the 1950′s.  As the film was introduced, the discussion highlighted the conflict between producer Hal E. Chester and director Tourneur on the showing of the demon.  Chester wanted to market a “monster movie”, which unsurprisingly required a monster.  Tourneur, no doubt hearkening to his work with Val Lewton, desired to build the dread and keep the mystery by never showing a creature at all, leaving it up to the imagination.  Though it’s hard to imagine the movie without the demon (he is very prominent, even on the poster), one could imagine a version that had no creature could have been paired very well with Lewton’s The Seventh Victim (1943), a devil worshiping horror film he made with Mark Robson a decade earlier in which atmosphere and dread permeate the film rather than anything “physical”.

I don’t know.  I think I’m in the minority that I actually like the monster.  I don’t necessarily know or think that it’s “better” with him than without.  Rather, I like him.  I was no doubt a child of that crowd to which Chester was marketing the film initially.  Devil worship in the 1940′s and 1950′s is much more far out than later in the century.  Considering it comes from a story written in 1911,  ”Casting the Runes” by M.R. James, perhaps adds even more deep dark past to it.  Who knows?

Great stuff, nonetheless.

Cold Comfort Farm (1995)

Cold Comfort Farm (1995) movie poster

director John Schlesinger
viewed: 01/06/2013

Cold Comfort Farm is the third film that I queued up after reading an Entertainment Weekly article listing the best films “you haven’t seen” of the last 25 years. I recalled it coming out and its buzz and popularity, but I never got around to seeing it for whatever reason, and really, it’s not the kind of film that I queue up regularly.

Directed late in the career of John Schlesinger (Billy Liar (1963), Midnight Cowboy (1969), Marathon Man (1976), to name a few), it was actually produced for British television, though was given theatrical release in the States.

Adapted from a 1932 novel by Stella Gibbons, it is a bit of a send up of the dire, hard life sagas of the small village English that became a stereotype in some of the later Victorians and beyond.  It’s the story of Flora Paste (Kate Beckinsale), a modern, urbane young thing who goes to live with her poor relations when family tragedies put her in need.  These overtly grouchy, grimy, gritty, earthy characters are played out to comic extremes, with surnames like Starkadder, Lambsbreath, and Doom.  But all it takes is a little modern attitude and some prodding from the spritely Flora to exorcise Cold Comfort Farm of its gloom and misery.  By the end of the film, everybody is matched up and happy as clams.

It makes for the cheerful, easy entertainment that one could easily watch with one’s in-laws.  It is clever and quite fun.  Some of the actors are better than others.  At the top end you have Ian McKellen and Joanna Lumley in small but very character-driven parts.  Some others are more average and a couple are a bit over the top.  Interestingly, Kate Beckinsale is quite good and charming.  I guess this is before her whole Goth Sci-Fi transformation in the Underworld (2003) series.  I didn’t even know she could smile.

I guess in a list of overlooked films of the past quarter century, maybe this would count.  Maybe not.  It’s certainly a charming enough diversion.

The Dark (2005)

The Dark (2005) movie poster

director John Fawcett
viewed: 01/05/2013

There is something “there” there in The Dark.  Set in the wild Welsh coastline, tripping through regional mythologies and more modern crimes and abuses, two estranged parents lose their teenage daughter to the sea…and the things beyond in the world of the dead.

Though the film stars Maria Bello and Sean Bean, the real star of the film is the Welsh coast.  The dramatic cliffs, the pounding sea, the lush grasses upon which the sheep all feast.  It’s dramatic and beautiful and an excellent setting for something eerie and fantastic.

But the film itself is not very good.  Bello’s histrionic mother is annoying and overwrought.  The daughter is a petulant beast.  At least the dad seems like a decent bloke.

It’s weak film-making, directing, writing, execution that squanders what has something at its core that is intriguing and enticing.  There is something in The Dark.  Not much.

Lawrence of Arabia (1962)

Lawrence of Arabia (1962) movie poster

director David Lean
viewed: 12/30/2012 at the Castro Theatre, SF, CA

One of the most beloved films of all times, I was keen to take the kids to see Lawrence of Arabia at the Castro Theatre, showing from a new digital restoration, that some have called “a revelation”.  It’s got to be said, the infinitesimal details that are made visible in this restoration are amazing.  Cinematographer Freddie Young’s epic vistas of the desert are doubtlessly more stunning than they have ever been, exemplified perhaps, in the scene in which Omar Sharif first appears, a hazy dot in a swimmingly illusory haze of heat, riding into visibility.  The scale of these scenes is profound.

This experience led me to reflect on the first time that I saw Lawrence of Arabia in its entirety.  It was in a film class in college, one of the first films I ever saw on VHS in letterbox format.  On a relatively small television screen.  Like many new to letterboxing, I was slightly appalled at how tiny everything was, but as the film went on, I could see that the breadth of the image was important to keep intact.  Even as a semi-microscopic thing, the film communicated its vastness and epic qualities.  I certainly had never seen it on the big screen, in now way in the detail of the new format.  It’s a tremendous way to enjoy the film.

Of course, it’s also nearly four hours long.  By far the longest film I’ve ever watched with the kids.  I think that part of it was an endurance run for them.

This is, in my opinion, a pinnacle of period, style, and genre.  David Lean accomplished here what filmmakers for decades since have been trying to recapture, those that dare into the realm of the epic.  And it’s all iconic stuff.  From Peter O’Toole’s performance, Young’s cinematography, Maurice Jarre’s musical score, this is classic cinema of the 20th century achieving something tremendous and amazing.

Certainly, anyone can disagree.  But it’s one of those films that most film lovers love.  I guess I’ll have to list myself among them.

The kids were indeed daunted by the length, but it was telling how intently focused they remained throughout the film, even in the parts that are probably a bit more complicated to follow.  How they’ll rank it for their favorites will be for them to decide.  To me, it’s just great cinema.

Kill List (2011)

Kill List (2011) movie poster

director Ben Wheatley
viewed: 09/20/2012

A hitman, suffering from some psychological stress, winds up taking another job with his partner, not just one hit, but a “kill list”.  He’s got trouble at home with a volatile, beautiful Swedish wife, and given the aberrant psychology, it’s never all that clear how much his “reality” is purely his, and not the same as the one generally observed by everyone else.  And then, when they get to their victims, it’s clear that he’s got a lot of violence within himself to dole out, sometimes even more than required, knocking off anybody suspected to be affiliated with a snuff film ring, for instance.

The film is by Ben Wheatley, and was getting a lot of buzz in its native Britain.  He’s already got another film out, Sightseers, and has been building a reputation for thriller cum horror.  And based on Kill List, I’d be very open to see what else he might have up his sleeve.

The best thing about Kill List are its plot twists, its blind alleys in regards of the story.  The less you know, the better.  So, if you’re it sounds remotely interesting, you should stop reading this and just see it.  The film doesn’t necessarily achieve greatness, but it shows promise, surprise, cleverness, and good performances.  It’s worth seeing for sure.  And quite gruesome at times.

But it’s a little hard to discuss entirely without spoiling it.  So read on if you will.

The film’s final twist, something that you get some hints of throughout, but really have no idea exactly what’s going on, is that there are a bunch of Satanists at the core of things.  His final hit is upon a “hunchback” who turns out to be his wife with his young son on her cloaked back.  Who he stabs to death in a ring of hooded worshipers.  This evokes some of Britain’s best horror films, such as The Wicker Man (1973) or Witchfinder General (1968), and it’s not exactly what I expected to happen.  But it’s also a bit unsatisfying, to me, at least.

I guess one of the challenges of an unreliable narrator (perspective) type of work is that it’s so often the case that it just turns out that the subject is crazy and his world is a world of madness that that twist is kind of predictable in and of itself.  I still kind of like it as it often offers for disjunctive and unpredictable moments and events, things that come from the unconscious or beyond.  The form itself is inherently oppositional to logic.

Kill List, though, is odd in both tone and style as well as narrative.  It’s mixture of surreal and impressionist reality and depiction, with naturalistic acting and dialogue, really does create something different and unique.  I will certainly be on the lookout for Wheatley’s next films.

London Boulevard (2010)

London Boulevard (2010) movie poster

director William Monahan
viewed: 08/12/2012

London Boulevard was recommended by a friend.  A sort of neo noir, it’s the story of man just released from prison, who comes back to the criminal underground that had made up his life before, and tries to take a path away from that former life.  As these stories almost inevitably go, it’s a hard life to get away from, especially when all your old gangster buddies want to keep you in and don’t mind blackmail and murder to get their way.

Colin Farrell stars as the ex-con who winds up picking up a legitimate job as a caretaker and protector for a reclusive young movie star, played by Keira Knightley.  I think that perhaps the way that this had come up was when I was discussing A Dangerous Method (2011) and how I had been surprised a bit by Knightley, who I’d come to truly disdain as an actress.  Her part here is quite small, really.  And she’s okay.

Farrell is a perplexing actor.  It seems like everyone seems to agree that he can really act.  He’s still a big name movie star.  But he really has never made a “great” film.  Watching him here, I was struck that he could  be good in the right hands, in the right film, with the right director.  Because he is good here in this decent, not particularly stand-out film.

Directed by William Monahan whose credits are mostly for writing, the film is mostly solidly decent.  Ray Winstone shows up as the creepily affable but brutal villain.  David Thewlis appears as a drugged out hanger-on (an interesting performance).  It’s got a fair amount of fairly fair things.  But it doesn’t add up to much.  It doesn’t stand out for me even three or four days since I watched it.

The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957)

The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) movie poster

director David Lean
viewed:  04/07/2012

Felix picked this one for movie night.  His grandfather had told him about it, saying that it was one of his favorite films.  But perhaps more than any other aspect of his grandfather’s thoughts on David Lean’s 1957 WWII prison camp epic The Bridge on the River Kwai was that his granddad and his friends, inspired by the film as kids, went into the woods and built bridges and blew them up afterwards.  I should note that Felix’s grandfather eventually went on to be an engineer for British Rail, actually working on building bridges.  Not a saboteur.

It was fine with me.  I’d thought of taking the kids to see it at the Castro some months ago.  I prefer to not be the only person suggesting films for the kids.

This is one of those films that seemed to be on so regularly when I was a kid that I don’t know how many times I’d seen it, or if I’d watched it all the way through in any one sitting, or what, but I’d probably seen the final scene, the blowing up of the bridge often enough to feel as familiar as almost any cinema that I can think of.

The story of English, American, Australian, Burmese, Thai, all sorts of soldiers (though mostly British), stuck in a Japanese prison camp in 1943 somewhere in Thailand or Burma, forced to work on a railroad bridge across a river.  When a new group of prisoners comes in, led by Alec Guinness in one of his most signature roles, almost everyone in the camp senses the meeting of an irresistible force against an unmovable object in the battle of wills between Guinness’s Col. Nicholson and Sessue Hayakawa’s brutal Colonel Saito.  Clara very quickly came to hate Saito, his cruelty and severity so starkly on display from the get-go.  But it’s not just the Japanese whose rigor and pride wind up destroying themselves.  When Nicholson wins the first battle of the wills, showing the integrity of the British (perhaps against better judgment or not), he then wants to show further the ability of the British to build a bridge, a one-upsmanship that leads to even greater hubris.

The always great William Holden plays the more callow but still sensible and ultimately noble American, the one man who gets to call a spade a spade as far as self-importance, stiff-upper-lippedness (phew! just typing that was tough), and general blindness to common sense.

The location settings are tremendous, the beauty and wild drama of the landscapes, the exotic flora and fauna that surround all these men, that they hardly take one brief glimpse of.    The cinematography won an Oscar for Jack Hildyard.  This is one of the films that immediately comes to mind in thinking of Lean’s work in epic cinema, the epic breadth not just of story, but of image and setting.  The thing won a bunch of Oscars: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor for Guinness.  This is one of those films that is pretty well just plain great.  One of the films whose greatness is pretty readily obvious to most.  Probably one which you’d find the majority of people would generally agree upon.

The kids liked it, too.  Though perhaps Felix thought that more than one dramatic bridge explosion would happen.  However, that finale is pretty damn awesome in and of itself, a familiar, but brilliant piece of cinema.